As publishers pursue the critical goal of revenue diversification, competing KPIs have become a significant blocker — not only slowing the pursuit of revenue streams but also compromising the user experience.
According to Digiday+ research, emerging revenue streams for publishers include programmatic advertising, events, affiliate commerce and selling products. The challenge is publishers are managing these diverse business initiatives in siloed departments, with limited optimization across organizations.
“We’ve seen how many publishers are navigating through so many new challenges, leading to numerous different revenue initiatives to tackle — and the side effect is creating more silos,” said Amit Elisha, general manager of Keystone and vice president of products at Outbrain. “Right now, many publishers do not have a unified view of how to optimize all of their various business initiatives and deliver the best offers to the most appropriate readers.”
Understanding the business costs of publisher silos
Many publishers rely on manual systems to manage business objectives, including subscriptions, e-commerce and ad sales. Siloed departments also lead to internal competition for resources, perhaps most notably site real estate.
“They try to convince other teams why they’re more important than others,” Elisha said, noting that silos often create room for this kind of debate. “Eventually, someone needs to be the arbitrator who makes the decision about who gets the real estate.”
How publishers prioritize KPIs that both compete and interact with each other is more of an art than a science, although data and analytics can offer some clarity. For subscriptions, this could be conversion rates and the lifetime value of retention. For e-commerce, this could be affiliate fees, conversion rates and average order size. On the other end of the spectrum, events bring in revenue through ticket sales and shape reader loyalty.
“I think that the challenge is really finding a common denominator between all of these initiatives because all of them have different business models and publishers need to be able to take them into account,” Elisha said.
Further complicating the picture for publishers, different departments take ownership of different initiatives and business objectives across the organization — leaving no one-size-fits-all solution for improving management systems.
Competing KPIs coupled with existing manual systems also have discernible impacts on readers. For instance, many systems lack needed tools for personalization and are hard-coded to push every offer to every user, even if those offers risk being irrelevant. This creates an overwhelming and even off-putting experience for readers — a hit to the bottom line and a wasted opportunity for publishers.
In an example that ties all this to the physical world, Elisha compares the mismanagement of a home page to a disorganized department store. A shopper may need to buy a shirt, but when they enter the store, they first see a cosmetics department and no signage indicating where the shirts are located. Similarly, publishers are best served by predicting what interests each reader and serving relevant offers as they “come through the door.” In the case of the department store, this may mean positioning pants near the shirts. For publishers, this may mean promoting an online event to a paid subscriber who cannot attend an in-person event due to their location.
“Users are used to having a 100% tailored experience for them when browsing platforms and apps — from Facebook through Spotify — and they are expecting publishers to create not only great content but also create an experience that aligns with their needs,” Elisha added.
Opportunities for breaking publisher silos
When it comes to publishers’ current practices, many are overwhelmed by the number of systems — which can span CMS, analytics dashboards, customer data platforms and more. Another challenge is evaluating the success of systems, which can be particularly difficult in the case of more technical examples.
“All of these systems have great reporting and analytics on what the system itself does, but they don’t speak to each other,” said Elisha. “Oftentimes, each system will be owned by a different department, and it’s up to the publisher to figure out how to connect the dots.”
The time spent evaluating the information and insights from these static systems is another wasted opportunity for publishers. By enlisting partners to create improved management systems, publishers can reprioritize.
“Publishers should look for technology partners that give them the tools to manage a business model — the whole of the business — rather than one small piece,” Elisha said. “They should be aware of the track record of that partner when it comes to personalization AI.
“Then, look at how the partner is actually making money,” Elisha suggested. “Are the incentives really aligned?”
Shared goals and expertise, as is often the case when ad tech companies and publishers are looking to maximize ad revenue as a collaborative effort, stand as an indication of a mutually beneficial partnership. For partners, experience in personalization technology and optimization for business outcomes is essential for more productive publisher systems. An effective user journey and experience platform breaks publisher silos, maximizes site real estate use across KPIs, creates strong alignment with readers, and enhances lifetime value.
As technology evolves to sustain partnerships that centralize shared goals and expertise, publishers will gravitate toward platforms that put those outcomes in their hands. That doesn’t mean the solution has to be everything all at once; instead, the next generation of silo-breaking tools will enable publishers to build solutions in the near term and then scale their de-siloed approaches as they improve on each KPI.
“The key for successful publishers is really to start small,” Elisha said. “Start small with one team, make them way more efficient, then break this silo with another team too. It’s hard to make this shift in how teams think. They don’t need to compete with each other, but rather they can partner for an aligned goal.”
USB logos finally make sense, thanks to a redesign
Cheaper OLED monitors might be coming soon
NASA Says Hurricane Didn’t Hurt Artemis I Hardware, Sets New Launch Window
NASA’s Artemis I moon mission launch, stalled by Hurricane Ian, has a new target for takeoff. The launch window for step one of NASA’s bold plan to return humans to the lunar surface now opens Nov. 12 and closes Nov. 27, the space agency said Friday.
The news comes after the pending storm caused NASA to scrub the latest Artemis I Iaunch, which had been scheduled for Sunday, Oct. 2. As Hurricane Ian threatened to travel north across Cuba and into Florida, bringing rain and extreme winds to the launch pad’s vicinity, NASA on Monday rolled its monster Space Launch System rocket, and the Orion spacecraft it’ll propel, back indoors to the Vehicle Assembly Building at Florida’s Kennedy Space Center.
The hurricane made landfall in Florida on Wednesday, bringing with it a catastrophic storm surge, winds and flooding that left dozens of people dead, caused widespread power outages and ripped buildings from their foundations. Hurricane Ian is “likely to rank among the worst in the nation’s history,” US President Joe Biden said on Friday, adding that it will take “months, years, to rebuild.”
Initial inspections Friday to assess potential impacts of the devastating storm to Artemis I flight hardware showed no damage, NASA said. “Facilities are in good shape with only minor water intrusion identified in a few locations,” the agency said in a statement.
Next up, teams will complete post-storm recovery operations, which will include further inspections and retests of the flight termination system before a more specific launch date can be set. The new November launch window, NASA said, will also give Kennedy employees time to address what their families and homes need post-storm.
Artemis I is set to send instruments to lunar orbit to gather vital information for Artemis II, a crewed mission targeted for 2024 that will carry astronauts around the moon and hopefully pave the way for Artemis III in 2025. Astronauts on that high-stakes mission will, if all goes according to plan, put boots on the lunar ground, collect samples and study the water ice that’s been confirmed at the moon’s South Pole.
The hurricane-related Artemis I rollback follows two other launch delays, the first due to an engine problem and the second because of a hydrogen leak.
Hurricane Ian has been downgraded to a post-tropical cyclone but is still bringing heavy rains and gusty winds to the Mid-Atlantic region and the New England coast.
4 On-Chain Metrics Show the Bitcoin Price Is Primed for Bullish Explosion
Celsius Network Will Hold Its Final Asset Auction On This Date
Bitcoin price sees first October spike above $20K as daily gains hit 5%
McDonald’s starts to accept Bitcoin and Tether in Swiss town
Bitcoin hits $45K ahead of July inflation report, but one fractal hints at looming correction
Smart Marketing Token (SMT) Is on a Mission to Help Blockchain Projects Reach Their Goals
Identity management org Sailpoint unveils no-code tool
Japan crypto exchange bitbank upgrades performance of its matching engine by 4x
Ethereum3 months ago
OKX Wins Provisional Crypto License In The UAE
Tech3 months ago
Kaseya, one year later: What have we learned?
Tech3 months ago
Best Prime Day deals: Last-minute deals you can shop today
Bit Coin3 months ago
Bit Coin3 months ago
Tothesmart Is an Exclusive New Smart Contract Built on the Binance Smart Chain Blockchain
Ethereum3 months ago
Binance.US taps Former Paypal Exec. as New CFO as The Crypto Exchange Formulates an IPO
Tech3 months ago
Lots to consider when buying cyber insurance, so do your homework
Bit Coin3 months ago
Biggest Movers: QNT Close to 2-Month High Despite Recent Declines, NEAR Moves Toward 1-Year Low